Scot Finnie admits that his ranking of Operating Systems in his visual tour of Vista is subjective, but still he could fill in a few more details for us about the criteria he has in mind. Is it the color of the desktop that leads him to prefer Mac OS X to Vista? Is the configurability of the networking protocols that leads him to prefer NeXT to BeOS?
If XP is a 6 and Vista's a 7, is he serious about that one third of a point difference between Windows ME and Windows 3.x? And he rates Windows 2K as equivalent to Linux -- all flavors!? What is up with that? OS/2 is number 9 -- behind "Mac System"? Huh?
Taller may be better, I won't dispute that, but is sage really better than teal? I think not.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment